[mdx] Joe on section 2.1

[Cantor, Scott]

On 9/26/13 2:14 PM, "Ian Young" <ian at iay.org.uk> wrote:

>On re-reading this, it strikes me that this may be trickier than it first
>appears. Is anyone here familiar enough with the http2 draft to know
>whether it provides all of what we're requiring?  As an example, if http2
>didn't allow for ETag then saying that you could use a later version of
>HTTP would be contradicted given that we require that facility.
>
>I guess if no-one knows, I should try and skim that spec and get an
>impression.

I'm not sure that the value warrants the time spent, we can always
evaluate and update the wording once HTTP 2.0 is real and relevant.

-- Scott