[mdx] Small change proposed to draft-young-md-query-saml-07

[Cantor, Scott]

On 11/8/17, 5:46 PM, "Tom Scavo" <trscavo at gmail.com> wrote:

> Right, and it's the last phrase I have a problem with (and have been
> pushing back on). Responder behavior should be well-defined.

Then the choices are to require failure or require responders support non-SHA1 identifiers in a field labeled SHA-1. Those are the options. A new field label is not an option because the code shipped many years ago, and the harm done here is just not sufficient to worry about.

-- Scott