[mdx] syntax for entity-attributes
Leif Johansson
leifj at sunet.se
Mon May 23 23:57:22 PDT 2011
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 05/23/2011 08:58 PM, Cantor, Scott E. wrote:
> On 5/23/11 2:55 PM, "Leif Johansson" <leifj at mnt.se> wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 05/23/2011 05:16 PM, Leif Johansson wrote:
>>> Fair enough
>>
>> So we need an attribute for "social tags" in the uri name-format. Any
>> thoughts about in what namespace we should drop that attribute?
>
> You could also use the "basic" format, I wasn't saying you shouldn't be
> allowed to use unqualified names, just that unspecified isn't how I'd do
> it.
>
> That said, I don't think it's really wise to expect interop using
> unqualified names either, but you could establish a registry in this spec,
> and define it that way.
Actually it makes a lot of sense to allow the most commonly used
name-format to have "unqualified" names - i.e make those as simple
as possible.
Cheers Leif
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk3bVtIACgkQ8Jx8FtbMZncH9gCeJsDC4C+b8npB8pVgE0ZcI+hz
AsUAn0XWjFliO6zI6rzAXRePBWlXiVpl
=d77D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the mdx
mailing list