[mdx] What next with MDX

[John Bradley]

We should probably update the ID so it is not expired.

With Chad moved on to other things,  I could take up editing if there is no other volunteer.

I agree that getting the basics into production is the highest priority.

John B.

On 2012-09-17, at 1:40 PM, Andy Dale <dalea at oclc.org> wrote:

> Thanks all that showed interest in making progress on this!
> 
> From what I understand the primary ‘open issue’ is the extended syntax proposed by Leif. From reviewing the MDX thread on this I am a little lost and would love a basic explanation of the problem and solution. 
> 
> There is mention on the list that the spec has ‘expired’. Presumably that is an IETF spec status thing. Do we as a group want to set a goal to bring the IETF spec into any particular state of formality? 
> 
> I believe that Chad was the sole editor of the original spec and that he is no longer able to contribute at that level (or maybe I’m wrong about that). Is there anyone else who wants to edit? I would be willing to try, I have contributed to several specs but never been ‘the editor’ before. 
> 
> Are there other use cases, extensions, clarifications that we want to add into the mix? (I will send a separate email with my specific problem and what I was thinking about a solution before I became aware of MDX).
> 
> Thanks again,
> 
> Andy Dale
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mdx mailing list
> mdx at lists.iay.org.uk
> http://lists.iay.org.uk/listinfo.cgi/mdx-iay.org.uk

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.iay.org.uk/pipermail/mdx-iay.org.uk/attachments/20120917/ecfd13c7/attachment-0002.htm>