[mdx] kicking starting MDX for REEP

[John Bradley]

I suspect it needs more work before being stamped done.

I don't even know that there is any real demand for it to be more than an Independent submission.

The important thing is to get enough agreement for people to build software for as a implementers draft and then out what may or may not need changing.

If we want it to be an IETF standard we could put it in apps area (not my first choice due to the noise) or get a AD to sponsor it.

I don't think the choice of SDO dramatically affects the amount of work.

John B.

On 2013-04-03, at 4:14 PM, "Cantor, Scott" <cantor.2 at osu.edu> wrote:

> On 4/3/13 3:05 PM, "Lucy Lynch" <lynch at isoc.org> wrote:
> 
>> I also lean towards IETF for this work but if Scott thinks this is an
>> easy 
>> push in OASIS we should consider that option as well
> 
> I don't know where something like this would fit in the IETF, but if
> somebody were to have the time to plug the draft into the OASIS template,
> it would take little additional time to get the SSTC to approve it. I
> would not expect significant, if any, comments, which means it's probably
> about two months from draft completion to finalization, including the
> review period.
> 
> -- Scott
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4507 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.iay.org.uk/pipermail/mdx-iay.org.uk/attachments/20130403/47072653/attachment.bin>